BabesAndStars Review
● https://babesandstars.com/The ranked model list is a time capsule. The first twenty-seven places are almost entirely performers whose peak was between 2005 and 2015, in an order that would have looked current then and looks archival now. A directory that ranks by all-time popularity and never re-weights it ends up describing the past, and the copyright line — running from 2008 — says how long that has been going on.
What the site is for is clearer than what it ranks. Four indexes: performers, videos, pictures and a sites list, with a top hundred over the top of them. The pictures are given equal billing with the video, which dates it in a more useful way, because galleries were the format this kind of directory was built for.
A newsletter is offered.
More than a dozen outbound links — cams, chat, games, discount pages, other directories — occupy the menu alongside the four sections that are actually its own.
- + A large XXX model directory
- + Very well organized in terms of content
- + The user interface is sleek and refined
- + Almost no ads
- + Quality content overall
- − Tags aren’t accessible from the main page
- − Tags don’t contain specific number of content they contain
- − Must pay to watch full movies
- − Search bar only works for models
- − Thumbnails don’t move







