RN
The single checkable fact about this article is that its subject no longer answers.
A request to jasmin.ai in August 2026 returns a 301 — a permanent move — to cuties.ai. So does a request to the model gallery the original piece linked to directly. The forward is not a courtesy landing page; it carries a full tracking payload naming jasminai as the referring source and a sub-affiliate code, which is the signature of a domain being run as a traffic funnel rather than as a product.
That reframes everything the original said. An article recommending a place to go, whose entire argument was that this particular platform did something special, now points at a door that opens onto a different building.
What is at the other end
Less than you would want before spending money.
The destination is reachable, which is more than can be said for the origin. Its title tag advertises an unfiltered AI image and video generator and names a third brand again — Lovescape, which has its own review here. Whether that means a further hop in the chain, shared infrastructure between two products in the same corporate orbit, or a stale tag, nothing observable here settles. The page body would not come through the converter, so nothing below is drawn from reading it.
Reported separately, and attributed as such: CutiesAI was founded in January 2024 and bought during 2025 by Byborg Enterprises SA, the company behind LiveJasmin. Consolidation in this corner of the market is real, and it is the likeliest ordinary explanation for a branded domain being collapsed into a sibling. It is not proof of anything about what you get after signing up.
Why the original review cannot simply be updated
Strip the enthusiasm out of it and there was nothing underneath to correct.
Every load-bearing sentence was unfalsifiable by construction. Companions that learn and adapt. Conversations that feel personal. Complete privacy with no profile required. Works on every device. Not one of those has a number, a policy citation, a price, or a test behind it, and the privacy claim is the one that should have been checked hardest — the trade coverage of the destination describes a token-based payment system and a free membership tier, and neither of those exists without an account.
An article can be corrected when it made claims. This one made promises, and promises do not have a fact-check surface.
The questions that survive
If AI companions are what you are shopping for, these are the ones worth carrying to whichever product is at the address this week.
- Who bills you, and under what descriptor. Token systems obscure unit cost by design. Work out what one conversation actually costs before the third top-up, and check what appears on the statement.
- What happens to the transcript. Chat logs with an AI companion are the most intimate text most people will ever type into a form. Retention period, training use, and deletion mechanics are policy questions with published answers — read them rather than trusting a marketing line about privacy.
- Whether an account is required to do anything real. Free tiers in this category usually gate customisation, which is the entire product.
- Who owns it now. Acquisition changes terms, pricing and data handling, and the branding is often the last thing to update. A domain that forwards to a sibling brand has already told you an ownership event happened.
- Whether the samples are generated or curated. Promotional imagery for a generator is selected output, not typical output.
Where this leaves the recommendation
Nowhere, deliberately.
There is no honest way to endorse a platform at an address that does not serve it, and no honest way to endorse the destination on the strength of a title tag and a trade report. The category is worth exploring; this specific pointer into it has expired.
For products that were actually reachable when they were written up, the AI porn sites section carries individual reviews, and the AI girlfriend app comparison covers how these platforms differ on the things that turn out to matter.