RN
wikiFeet Review
● https://wikifeet.com/It calls itself collaborative, and the structure bears that out: user uploads, a foot of the day, a foot of the week, a random gallery. This is a wiki in form as well as name, maintained by contributors rather than staff.
The telling feature is the birthday rail. The front page wishes named celebrities a happy birthday — the behaviour of a fan database that treats its subjects as an ongoing interest rather than as image inventory, which is a stranger register than a fetish archive usually operates in.
What gets catalogued are real people who did not open these pages, assembled and annotated by volunteers who did. The wiki model spreads that work across many hands without changing what it is.
A static fetch is refused and only a browser gets in, so what rendered was the front page and no further. Catalogue size, the rating system the format implies, moderation and any removal route could not be established from it.
- + Incredibly huge gallery of celebrity feet photos
- + Just about every famous chick you can think of
- + Massive galleries
- + Updated constantly by users
- + Search filters for digging through the collection
- − Can only use one search filter at a time
- − Family-friendly (no porn!)
- − Unorganized videos
