RN
Almost every AI companion site makes the same pitch, so the interesting question is never what the pitch says. It is how much of the product you are allowed to see before you hand over an email address.
For Spicier.com the answer is: the shop window and the legal pages, and nothing else. That shapes what a review can honestly cover, so this one covers the legal pages properly rather than paraphrasing the marketing.
What is observable without an account
The landing page presents the service as an AI character creator — customisable appearance, personality and voice, with text and voice chat and a gallery of characters made by other users. The framing on the page runs to "create your perfect AI lover" and an invitation to start chatting free.
You can browse featured characters. Creating one requires registration, and every route into the actual product terminates at a create-account button.
There is an RTA label in the footer, which is a self-applied metadata tag that filtering software can read. No age-verification step is presented before the content, which is worth stating precisely: RTA is a signal to the parent's side of the connection, not a check on the user's.
No price is published anywhere on the public site. The path a visitor would guess for a pricing page returns a 404, and the terms confirm that paid subscriptions exist without stating what they cost. Whatever the tiers are, you find out after signing up.
The terms are more specific than the marketing
Read them before you decide, because they contain the three things that matter and the front page contains none of them.
Subscriptions renew automatically. Cancelling ends future terms; the term you are in continues to its end. This is standard for the category and it is also the single most common source of complaint about it, so treat the renewal date as the thing to diary.
Refunds are not general. The terms rule them out where an account is terminated for a breach, and otherwise defer to policies stated elsewhere on the site — which means the refund position is not fixed by the terms you agree to.
Real people are prohibited. The terms bar companions closely resembling real celebrities or public figures, alongside a prohibited-content list covering CSAM, bestiality, incest, hate speech and content promoting violence. Enforcement is described as removal plus possible suspension or ban. What is written is a rule; how it is applied to a character someone builds privately is not something an outside reader can verify, and this article does not claim it either way.
The age requirement is 18.
Who is behind it
The privacy policy names a company: Warmtech Ltd, registered in the Republic of Cyprus under HE 418620, at an address in Limassol. That is more disclosure than a good many sites in this category offer, and it is the reason this section can exist at all.
Two footnotes on it. The support address given in that policy is on a domain that did not resolve when checked, which may be an artefact of a rename or may simply be stale — either way, the published contact route was not reachable. And the same company name appears in the footer of Lovescape, according to the first-party check recorded in this site's Cuties AI guide; Lovescape has its own review here. A shared registered company is worth knowing and is not evidence that two products are the same product, so nothing further is inferred from it.
What the privacy policy does not say
This is where the gap is, and it is the gap that should decide the question for anyone cautious.
The policy covers the ordinary ground — data collected, third-party payment processors, generic retention language. It does not state how long conversation logs are kept. It does not state whether conversations or user-created characters are used to train or fine-tune models.
For a service whose entire value proposition is that you tell it things you would not tell a person, those two omissions are the material ones. The absence of a statement is not evidence that either practice is happening. It does mean you have no commitment either way, and the whole point of a policy is to be the place a commitment lives.
The claims this review cannot check
The category's standard marketing promises persistent memory across sessions, emotional continuity and conversational quality several tiers above a scripted bot. Those are all claims about behaviour behind the account wall.
None of them was tested here. Nor was the underlying model identified — the site does not say which model or provider it runs on, which is common in the category and is the reason performance claims in it are so hard to compare. Treat any specific figure you read about memory length, response quality or character depth, including in the site's own blog — eight promotional posts from January and February 2026 — as marketing until you have tried it.
Whether it is worth your time
If you want a customisable AI companion and are comfortable with an unstated price, an unstated retention period and an unstated training position, this one at least discloses its corporate identity and publishes terms specific enough to argue with, which is not universal here.
If any of those three unstated things matters to you, the sensible order is to sign up, find the price, read the refund policy it points to, and set a calendar reminder before the first renewal. The AI sex chat and AI porn sections list the alternatives if you would rather compare first.